In the final analysis we value and stress judicial independence for what it assures to the public, not for what it grants to judges themselves. Ultimately, the sole purpose of the concept is to ensure that every citizen who comes before the court will have [their] case heard by a judge who is free of governmental or private pressures that may impinge upon the ability of that judge to render a fair and unbiased decision in accordance with the law.[2] 

With those few remarks, I strongly urge the Chief Justice to abandon the destructive path he has embarked on. If for nothing else, to avoid taking us back to the dark days when nightmares like the 2007/2008 post election violence were visited upon us because protagonists had no confidence in the judiciary.

 

 

[1] U.N. Security Council, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary General. (S/2004/616). 23 August 2004. Online: http://www.unrol.org/files/2004%20report.pdf

[2] Garry D. Watson, “The Judge and Court Administration” in The Canadian Judiciary (Toronto: Osgoode, 1976) at 183 quoted in British Columbia, Commission of Inquiry Pursuant to Order-in-Council #1885, July 5, 1979, Report of the Honourable Mr. Justice P.D. Seaton, Commissioner (October 23, 1979) at 11 [“Seaton Report”].

Add comment


Security code
Refresh